Service Workers
Introduction
Service workers are only supported on Chromium-based browsers.
If you're looking to do general network mocking, routing, and interception, please see the Network Guide first. Playwright provides built-in APIs for this use case that don't require the information below. However, if you're interested in requests made by Service Workers themselves, please read below.
Service Workers provide a browser-native method of handling requests made by a page with the native Fetch API (fetch) along with other network-requested assets (like scripts, css, and images).
They can act as a network proxy between the page and the external network to perform caching logic or can provide users with an offline experience if the Service Worker adds a FetchEvent listener.
Many sites that use Service Workers simply use them as a transparent optimization technique. While users might notice a faster experience, the app's implementation is unaware of their existence. Running the app with or without Service Workers enabled appears functionally equivalent.
How to Disable Service Workers
Playwright allows to disable Service Workers during testing. This makes tests more predictable and performant. However, if your actual page uses a Service Worker, the behavior might be different.
To disable service workers, set service_workers context option to "block".
import pytest
@pytest.fixture(scope="session")
def browser_context_args(browser_context_args):
return {
**browser_context_args,
"service_workers": "block"
}
Accessing Service Workers and Waiting for Activation
You can use browser_context.service_workers to list the Service Workers, or specifically watch for the Service Worker if you anticipate a page will trigger its registration:
- Sync
- Async
with context.expect_event("serviceworker") as worker_info:
page.goto("/example-with-a-service-worker.html")
service_worker = worker_info.value
async with context.expect_event("serviceworker") as worker_info:
await page.goto("/example-with-a-service-worker.html")
service_worker = await worker_info.value
browser_context.on("serviceworker") event is fired before the Service Worker has taken control over the page, so before evaluating in the worker with worker.evaluate() you should wait on its activation.
There are more idiomatic methods of waiting for a Service Worker to be activated, but the following is an implementation agnostic method:
- Sync
- Async
page.evaluate("""async () => {
const registration = await window.navigator.serviceWorker.getRegistration();
if (registration.active?.state === 'activated')
return;
await new Promise(resolve => {
window.navigator.serviceWorker.addEventListener('controllerchange', resolve);
});
}""")
await page.evaluate("""async () => {
const registration = await window.navigator.serviceWorker.getRegistration();
if (registration.active?.state === 'activated')
return;
await new Promise(resolve => {
window.navigator.serviceWorker.addEventListener('controllerchange', resolve);
});
}""")
Network Events and Routing
Any network request made by the Service Worker is reported through the BrowserContext object:
- browser_context.on("request"), browser_context.on("requestfinished"), browser_context.on("response") and browser_context.on("requestfailed") are fired
- browser_context.route() sees the request
- request.service_worker will be set to the Service Worker instance, and request.frame will throw
Additionally, for any network request made by the Page, method response.from_service_worker return true when the request was handled a Service Worker's fetch handler.
Consider a simple service worker that fetches every request made by the page:
If index.html registers this service worker, and then fetches data.json, the following Request/Response events would be emitted (along with the corresponding network lifecycle events):
| Event | Owner | URL | Routed | response.from_service_worker |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| browser_context.on("request") | Frame | index.html | Yes | |
| page.on("request") | Frame | index.html | Yes | |
| browser_context.on("request") | Service Worker | transparent-service-worker.js | Yes | |
| browser_context.on("request") | Service Worker | data.json | Yes | |
| browser_context.on("request") | Frame | data.json | Yes | |
| page.on("request") | Frame | data.json | Yes |
Since the example Service Worker just acts a basic transparent "proxy":
- There's 2 browser_context.on("request") events for
data.json; one Frame-owned, the other Service Worker-owned. - Only the Service Worker-owned request for the resource was routable via browser_context.route(); the Frame-owned events for
data.jsonare not routeable, as they would not have even had the possibility to hit the external network since the Service Worker has a fetch handler registered.
It's important to note: calling request.frame or response.frame will throw an exception, if called on a Request/Response that has a non-null request.service_worker.
Routing Service Worker Requests Only
- Sync
- Async
def handle_route(route: Route):
if route.request.service_worker:
# NB: accessing route.request.frame here would THROW
route.fulfill(content_type="text/plain", status=200, body="from sw")
else:
route.continue_()
context.route("**", handle_route)
async def handle_route(route: Route):
if route.request.service_worker:
# NB: accessing route.request.frame here would THROW
await route.fulfill(content_type="text/plain", status=200, body="from sw")
else:
await route.continue_()
await context.route("**", handle_route)
Known Limitations
Requests for updated Service Worker main script code currently cannot be routed (https://github.com/microsoft/playwright/issues/14711).